Hot Topics > Teaching Music in Public Schools

 

From Teachers and Religion in Public Schools, page 36

May a music teacher include religious music in choral programs?

Yes, religious music may be taught if it is "presented objectively as part of a secular program of education." 128 (Florey v. Sioux Falls School District, 619 F.2d 1311,1314 (8th Cir. 1980). cert.denied, 449 U.S. 987 (1980), quoting Abington v. Schempp, 374 U.S. at 225; Bauchman v. West High School, 132 F.3d 542 (10th Cir. 1997); Doe v. Duncanville Independent School District, 70 F.3d 402 (4th Cir. 1995).

For example, a choral program may include Christmas carols and other religious music. (Florey, 619 F.2d at 1314, 1316 n.5)

Students may be given the opportunity to perform "a full range of music, poetry and drama that is likely to be of interest to the students and their audience." (Id).

A federal appellate court has explained that "to allow students only to study and not to perform religious art, literature and music when such works have developed an independent secular and artistic significance would give students a truncated view of our culture." (id.at 1316).

The religious contact of the programs must be "presented objectively as part of a secular program of education." (id., quoting Abington v Schempp, 374 U.S. at 225)

While allowing the inclusion of Christmas carols in school programs, the same court noted that an elementary school program could not include a "Christmas quiz" in which the students responded as a group to questions by the teacher regarding the Christmas story. (Florey, 619 F.2d at 1318).

Two other federal appellate courts have allowed choirs to sing religious songs.
(Bauchman v West High School, 132 F.3d 542 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 2370 (1998); Doe v. Duncanville Independent School District, 70 F.3d 402 (5th Cir. 1995).

One federal appellate court expressly permitted a school choir to have a religious song as its theme song because legitimate secular reasons existed for maintaining it as a theme song. (Doe v. Duncanville, 70 F.3d at 407 (legitimate secular reasons were: 1) Good music by a reputable composer; 2) useful to teach students sight-reading; and 3) useful to learn to sing a capella.).

The court wrote:
Indeed, to forbid [the school district] from having a theme song that is religious would force [the school district] to disqualify the majority of appropriate choral music simply because it is religious. Within the world of choral music, such a restriction would require hostility, not neutrality, toward religion...A position of neutrality towards religious must allow choir directors to recognize the fact that most choral music can be sung is tantamount to censorship and does not send students a message of neutrality. (id. at 407-408.)

Another federal appellate court rejected a student's lawsuit that challenged, as an Establishment Clause violation, the number of religious songs performed by a high school choir, including several written by contemporary composers. (Bauchman v. West High School,132 F.3d 542 (10th Cir. 1997).

The choir performed secular songs as well. (id. at 555).

The court noted:
Any choral curriculum designed to expose students to the full array of vocal music culture...can be expected to reflect a significant number of religious songs. Moreover, a vocal music instructor would be expected to select any particular piece of sacred choral music, like any particular piece of secular choir music, in part of its unique qualities useful to teach a variety of vocal music skills (i.e., sight reading, intonation, harmonization, expression), (id. at 554)

The court also rejected the student's challenge to choir performances at religious sites such as churches. The court determined that a choir director could wish to use churches or other religious sites because they might be "acoustically superior to high school auditoriums or gymnasiums" and would give the teacher an opportunity to "showcase his choir to the general public in an atmosphere conducive to the performance of serious choral music." (id. The court noted that the choir performed in a number of settings, religious and secular, "all of which reflect the community's culture and heritage." Id. at 555)

A federal district court did prohibit a school secretary from leading a Gospel Choir that met on school grounds immediately after school as a student extracurricular group. (Sease v. School District of Philadelphia, 811 F. Supp. 183 (E.D. pa. 1993)

If the school secretary wanted to continue to participate in the choir's practices on school campus immediately after school, the choir would have to change its repertoire to include songs that had no religious references, although it could continue also to sing religious songs. (id. at 186-187)

The choir sang at school assemblies and at community events, including churches. (id. at 184. The court did not address these activities and did not seem concerned by them).

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS IN PUBLIC EDUCATION PLEASE BUY THE ENTIRE RESOURCE BOOK AT HTTP://TEACHERS.SAFESHOPPER.COM